Tag Archive: Training Program

A Summer Symphony with the Regenerative Grower Training Program

As summer arcs toward the fall, the Horn Farm’s demonstration field sings with the signs of the harvest season.

Ripening tomatoes and swelling squashes carry the melody, buttressed by the harmonies of murmuring pollinators as they flutter about the wildflower meadows. In the spaces between, seedlings of fall crops emerge from newly-prepped soil, balancing the tune like altos.

Even on the most humid days, it’s a performance to savor!

Behind this chorus, six students in the Regenerative Grower Training Program (RGTP) have become both composers and audience. As they pass the half-way point of this 22-week immersion, Tam Shertzer – co-instructor for the course – reflects on the ways the season has changed not just for the land, but for this first cohort of Regenerative Growers:

It’s been exciting for me, as a first year staff member at Horn Farm, to be a part of developing the Regenerative Grower Training Program! This year’s participants are inquisitive and enthusiastic – there have been engaging conversations and wonderful opportunities for us all to learn from each other. Over the weeks we’ve spent together, folks have taken ownership of tending the land – asking the big questions, offering their ideas, and thinking like an ecosystem – which is ultimately one of the goals of this program.

Indeed, if there’s any chorus that has carried this program from the start, it’s thinking like an ecosystem. When approaching the land, students are encouraged to ask questions like: how does nature sustain itself? How can we mirror and honor this in designing systems for growing food?

How can living ecosystems inform the questions we ask and the decisions we make as growers?

The roles of “gardener,” “grower,” and “farmer” broaden when we look through this ecological lens. Rather than simply working on the land to obtain a yield, Regenerative Growers are seeing their place in partnership with the land – co-producing abundance by harnessing the wisdom that nature’s concert sings to us.

Tending to crops is just a part of the composition. In fostering regenerative systems, we also need to tend the soil, the water, and the surrounding ecology that support these crops in growing themselves.

After all, as the instructors like to say: the crops are doing most of the work anyway!

By positioning ourselves as tenders of the whole, our interactions with the land begin to resemble how growing food has always been, at least before the rise of industrial and chemically-dependent agriculture. Students are working at a small scale, within the parameters of our human and ecological limits. This carries its own challenges, lessons, and imperfections. As students can testify, it’s certainly not the bucolic vision that back-to-the-landers would make it seem. Nor is it air tight: we’re still self-consciously reliant on industrial vehicles, tools, and plastics (albeit recycled whenever possible). But as we continue to share insights, address shortcomings, enjoy yields, and lay groundwork for next season, we’re experiencing what makes ecologically-minded growing truly regenerative for the land and for people.

Read along to glean some of the skills and lessons students (and our staff!) have learned as we spend this first season of the RGTP together.

From the Ground Up: Ecological Growing in Action

So what does the music of the growing space sound like when we step back and listen with an ecological frame of mind? For one, the bass of the symphony becomes apparent like never before. Upholding all those melodies and harmonies, the earth beneath us – the soil – now captures our attention. What is easily overlooked as the drone underlying the ensemble is actually the remarkable, resolute foundation on which everything depends.

Tuning Into Living Soils, and Unlikely Allies

Students have prepped many growing beds this season, learning how to use the resources that the land provides to build soil vitality in both the near-term and over time. The best advice, as ecological thinking would have it, comes from the forest next door. Here, living, layered soils build themselves. With this model in mind, we’ve identified some basic tenants of soil health and applied them, including aeration, coverage, and foregoing the tiller to minimize disturbance (or maintain the bass line, so to speak. Ever heard a tune without a bass line? Eerie!).

Digging deep into soil ecology, students are becoming acquainted with some surprising allies for our soil-building efforts: weeds.

Gardeners are no strangers to the frustration of a weedy plot, but so-called “weeds” are what we make them, and for the regenerative grower, weeds can be a resource rather than a hinderance.

In natural systems, the opportunistic plants that take residence in disturbed and exposed soils are founding members of an unfolding story. “Weeds” literally lay the groundwork for soil fertility. These plants are so persistent not because they’re pernicious, but because they are prodigious at mining nutrients from soils where other plants would struggle to grow. When these nutrient-miners die back each growing season – which is the case for most plants we consider “weeds,” being annuals – they deposit their bounty onto the surface. Over time, mounting stocks of reclaimed nutrients fuel an increasingly complex soil food web, priming the ground for new plant communities to move in.

Using weeds to our advantage. Biomass in this bed was left in place to re-cover the soil after decompaction.

With this process in mind, students have applied a few techniques for prepping beds by incorporating rather than antagonizing weeds. Green mulching is one example, which entails pulling and cutting plants before they go to seed and laying them in place as nutrient-rich biomass. The benefits of green mulching are themselves layered – not only will decomposing plant matter feed soil microbiota and the plants we intend to grow, but the litter keeps the soil covered, maintaining moisture and temperature.

As a proponent of rethinking the role of weeds in the growing system, co-instructor and Farm Manager Jon Darby encourages everyone to know each weed and the services they provide.

For students, pulling a weed isn’t encouraged unless they can identify it first. Hence, weeding in the ecological growing space is a selective, mindful, and even meditative practice.

Many plants conventionally victimized by the trowel, the mower, or worse – the herbicide – are spared in this ethic, because their “weediness” is nullified by oft-overlooked benefits like feeding the soil, creating dappled shade, attracting beneficial insects, and, of course, providing free food and medicine (purslane, anyone?).

Harmony in Complexity: Mimicking Biodiversity

A symphony is a mosaic of sounds. As listeners, we’re captivated not by individual players, but by intentional groupings of instruments that dance with one another. Much the same can be said for healthy plant communities. Nature isn’t a stranger to monocrops – ecological succession, or natural changes in ecosystems over time, teaches us that plant communities can take many forms. But by and large, high diversity fosters productivity and a resilient whole.

With this frame of mind, RGTP students are learning how ecosystems can inspire how we map our crop systems. This doesn’t necessarily mean abandoning order. Rows and structures promote efficient harvests, and as members of the ecological community ourselves, it’s important to weigh our needs in the system. But even within limits, we can design plant communities that mirror how ecosystems are structured. In doing so, we also replicate the benefits of ecosystem structures, which buffer against weather, pest and disease pressure, and other unpredictable disturbances.

A classic example of this ecological planting style has deep roots on this continent. Testifying to the vast exchanges of knowledge and resources that traversed what we now call North America, countess Indigenous communities from the southwest to the Susquehanna Riverlands developed a method for planting three staple crops – corn, beans, and squash – in tight-knit groupings known as the Three Sisters. Many Indigenous farmers and growers continue to honor this legacy today, serving as leaders in ecological food production.

In a Three Sisters plot, each sister uplifts her two companions, enriching all three while creating a more resilient whole.

Towering corn provides sturdy scaffolding for vining beans to climb. In turn, the beans bring nourishment to the soil by increasing the availability of nitrogen. You may be familiar with beans as “nitrogen-fixers”; thanks to beneficial bacteria in their roots, beans and other legumes convert nitrogen from the atmosphere into a form that can be absorbed by plants, making them a choice cover crop in sustainable planting systems.

While beans and corn dance skyward in this way, their sibling, squash, delivers her own benefits on the ground below. Squash spreads horizontally, creating a dense and spiny understory that offers protection from herbivores while creating ample shade for the soil. She maintains everyone’s water reserves, even through the driest spells of summer, and her sisters return the favor: a nitrogen boost from beans, and gradual trickles of water from corn after rain.

The three sisters are just one time-tested example of what we can call plant guilds, or communities that, by virtue of their their togetherness, offer services for each of their members. RGTP students continue to engage with guilds and companionships that are informed by our our goals as growers. These goals can include soil-building (incorporating legumes), pest deterrence (alliums and brassicas), partitioning resources, and making the most of small spaces. Even aesthetics and “just for experiment’s sake” are valid goals for the playful fringes of the field (proving, for example, that fennel and peppers can indeed grow together!).

When it comes to companion planting, you’ll find no shortage of resources peddling overstated claims about which plants can and cannot go together. RGTP students take the extra steps of investigating the “whys” behind these claims, tracing plants back to the functions they serve within each mini-ecosystem we’re growing.

Critical thinking is another refrain that threads the course, as we interrogate commonly-held assumptions in gardening and farming that we often take for granted without knowing why. Why do we eradicate weeds and remove them from the planting space? Why do we till the soil? Do the benefits we presume outweigh the cons or create missed opportunities? What assumptions – ecological, generational, cultural, industrial – underlie conventional scripts about how food ought to be grown, or how we ought to handle problems like pests and diseases? What information, though conveyed to us as universal, is actually quite contextual to time, place, and growing conditions?

On that last query: working in such a place-based, context-specific medium as ecological growing, RGTP students are justifiably exhausted (and equally spurred!) by the same answer around every corner: “it depends …” It’s important to glean what we can from observable patterns across nature, but at the same time, we have to acknowledge the specific conditions of where we are growing to move forward with ecological sensibility and tact.

Orchestrating Perennials: Future Resilience from the Garden to the Farm

Most of the plants that take root across today’s farms and gardens are short-lived. Those that complete their entire life cycle in one growing season–germinating in the spring and dropping seeds by the fall–are called annuals. Think of tomatoes and all three sisters: corn, beans, and squashes. Biennials, you might then guess, complete their life cycle over two growing seasons, usually by producing hearty leaves in their first year and offspring in their second. Swiss chard, beets, and brassicas like kale and broccoli fall into this camp.

As the self-sustaining ecosystems neighboring our farms and gardens show us, however, nature tends toward perennials. These plants will live for multiple, even hundreds, of years, producing flowers, fruits, or other harvestable materials over many growing seasons without the need for re-planting or heavy intervention.

Let’s get back to thinking like an ecosystem here. Thinking in this way can only take us so far if we keep our sights fixed on the familiar archetypes of farming and gardening culture: the annuals and biennials.

The RGTP shows students how we can reimagine these conventional systems through ecological design, but ultimately, perennial gardens bring us closer than ever to the self-sufficiency and integration modeled by ecology.

So, while students have spent much of this season among the veggies, we’ve also taken time to dip our toes in the budding network of perennial growing systems taking root across the Horn Farm.

Tam shares how this element of the course brings not just new energy, but increasing importance to the course. After all, the RGTP is about equipping growers with versatile and adaptable skills, not just to foster healthy food ecosystems, but to do so through an uncertain future:

In the time that remains, I’m really looking forward to establishing (and re-establishing!) more perennial food spaces in our demo field. As the season progresses, and we’ve already seen some intense heat waves, the value of perennial systems has become more and more apparent. (Annuals are certainly worth the time and effort, but who doesn’t love a trusty mulberry tree that produces reliably every spring?!) I can’t wait to see what kinds of designs the RGTP participants create once they have the opportunity to put their brains into design mode. I’m expecting that some truly beautiful, diverse, and abundant spaces will take shape this year at Horn Farm!

On the ground at the Horn Farm Center, perennial growing systems are becoming increasingly common. Dense plantings of American black elderberries (Sambucus canadensis) line the edges of our demonstration field. Beneath alleys of mulberry (Morus alba), American plum (Prunus americana), and nut-bearing trees, herbaceous perennials like sochan (Rudbeckia laciniata) and bee balm (Monarda spp.) grace the soil. Even fallow plots awaiting new designs are arguably perennial, with their preponderance of edible “weeds” like nettles, dandelions, and violets regaling our foraging programs with enlarged notions of food.

As Tam mentions, long-lived perennial growing systems like these offer greater resilience in the face of an increasingly mercurial environment. Human-caused climate change has vexed our summers with extremes of heat, rain, and disease, but tree and shrub systems are better equipped for handling these pressures because they already do what we work so hard to replicate in the annual and biennial gardens. Their tenacious root systems keep the soil from eroding while managing inconsistent water inputs; their copious shade keeps soil cool on relentlessly sunny days; constant leaf debris and woody prunings feed soil biota continuously; and the crops they produce – especially nuts – offer us more calories, more versatility, and better storability than conventional crops.

Students in the RGTP have gotten a taste of agroforestry through engaging with growing spaces that incorporate trees, shrubs, and other long-lived plants at the Horn Farm. They’ve also glimpsed ways to design these kinds of systems, learning about food forests and forest gardening. As Tam mentions, they’ll soon be turning design into action, supporting the creation of demonstration forest gardens that will serve future iterations of the RGTP, classes for the general public, and, undoubtedly, the ecological web we’re creating across the Horn Farm’s educational landscape.

Perennial plants, agroforestry, and concepts like forest gardening sound newfangled to many, but they constitute some of the oldest agricultural interactions between humans and the land. What we today call agroforestry systems predate the advent of annual-based agriculture the world over. So while the thrust of the RGTP is about thinking like an ecosystem to rethink our roles as growers, a more accurate verb for our relationship with the land might be one rekindling, reigniting, even reintegrating. Returning to our roots as custodians of wellbeing and longevity, and in so doing, becoming perennial ourselves.

Cadence: Regenerative Pathways for Food and Community

Nestled among the demonstration gardens, one Three Sister’s plot conceals something peculiar. Peer through the squash leaves and you’ll see finger-like structures protruding from the bases of some of the corn. Bendy and blunted with gel-caked tips, these structures look like something out of a Seussical forest.

One of our students – an enthusiast for rare seeds – gifted us with kernels from a variety of corn known to fix nitrogen. Like the root nodules of legumes that host nitrogen-fixing bacteria, these structures – which are actually above-ground roots – perform a similar dance. They attract bacteria with sugar-rich mucilage in order to farm nitrogen from the atmosphere.

Upon planting this curious corn, the RGTP crew coined it “The People’s Corn.” The name stuck – a fond term of endearment for an experimental plot that, we hope, will yield nitrogen-fixing corn seed for future seasons. The People’s Corn is always on students’ minds: “How’s The People’s Corn?” “Let’s go check on The People’s Corn,” “Squash isn’t looking so hot in The People’s Corn.” “Ants are farming aphids in The People’s Corn!”

We’re all familiar with giving a namesake to something you love. For the Horn Farm, this makes The People’s Corn an emblem of the RGTP’s greater vision.

The least we can do is empower folks to regenerate the land and our relationship to it; in the grand scheme, we’re striving to regenerate peoples’ sense of connection with one another. Slowly but surely, by nurturing a healthier landscape together, we’re growing food, fodder, and well-(g)rounded community.

History shows us that food grown ecologically has always carried community. In fact, to work regeneratively with the land, we need community. The long game of rekindling an ecologically-imaginable food system demands as many tending and curious hands as we can muster. It’s a bold about-face to the trajectory that industrial agriculture has taken, severing more and more of us from the sources of our lives.

So when we lead with thinking like an ecosystem, mimicking ecology in the growing space is just part of the symphony. A thriving ecosystem is itself a network of players, each contributing to the whole.

Thus, through tending ecological food systems, nature also teaches us to tend and grow our communities.

We’re grateful to this year’s first RGTP for moving in that spirit with us; we’re just a small collective of caretakers dedicated to learning and growing with the land, but with resilient community-creation in the works – from the plants to the people – we’re sowing seeds for a regenerative future.

The Horn Farm Ecosystem: Miyawaki

Planting Seeds of Resilience:

The Miyawaki Method

Planting Seeds of Resilience is the fourth installment of the Horn Farm Ecosystem blog series. Through periodic articles, we’ll walk the land in writing: visiting the forests, regenerative fields, and ecological action sites of the Horn Farm Center to explain our stewardship work, uplift nature, and inspire love for the land. Read past installments by scrolling down our blog page.


“Memory,

native to this valley, will spread over it

like a grove, and memory will grow

into legend, legend into song, song

into sacrament. The abundance of this place,

the songs of its people and its birds,

will be health and wisdom and indwelling

light. This is no paradisal dream.”

Wendell Berry (from Work Song: A Vision, 1977)

They’re unassuming from a distance. Nestled among the familiar marks of land restoration and farm activities, these plots of vegetation don’t necessarily command attention to the untrained eye. Beyond missing them completely, a new visitor might gloss them over as fallow edges or, how dare we!, would-be agricultural plots in wild disrepair. Whatever the impression may be, there is no ready clue to the wandering onlooker that what they’re seeing is actually extraordinary.

Step closer, however, and curiosity begins to spin.

Your eyes dart up, down, around, and into an impossibly dense cluster of flora, frenetically dappled and dizzying. Ablaze in summer green or tangled tawny in winter, every inch is taken up: branches and stems colliding with leaves of kaleidoscopic shapes and sizes, cascading upward and downward at once. The wind flicks and this sea of vegetation expands and contracts in unison, somehow luxurious and chaotic, like a single organism revealing to you their nested layers of complexity.

It’s a grand experience to have while standing on a modest mowed path surrounded by farmland and the noise of passing traffic. Somehow in spite of this, visiting these plots evokes the feeling of standing in a towering, boundless forest, abuzz from floor to canopy. Their greatest departure from this bucolic setting lies not in biological richness, as you might expect. They’re simply … compact.

The mesmerizing embrace of a century’s old woodland: condensed to the length of a fallen tree and the width of a deer’s leap. At the time this blog was published, the tallest trees grace 15, 20 feet–but you can easily imagine them shooting upward rapidly in a rebuke to time’s slow churn. So yes–somehow, the young, fresh, miniature community you’re touring is so recognizably a forest. Less than five years old, and already beckoning the scurries, buzzes, and wingbeats of diverse wildlife, as if time has accelerated and you’re peering into a wild future contained in ~20’ by ~8’.

Present and future are mingling in this big tiny forest–one of dozens that are taking shape across the Horn Farm Center.

Five years ago, Woodland Steward Wilson Alvarez began an experiment with students in the Woodland Steward Training Program–the predecessor of the Horn Farm Center’s current Land Steward Training Program. The prompt was straightforward: plant a ton of trees and shrubs in a little bit of space–little, as far as tree plantings are concerned. The site for this experiment was selected for its utility: paralleling the relentless highway that slices by the Horn Farm (Rt. 30 for our sympathizing community readers), these plants would create a border against noise, road pollutants, and an unsavory view. If, of course, the high-density, high-diversity approach would take. Counteracting the management recommendations of conventional riparian buffer planting, this experiment shelved the tree tubes and mower-centric spacing in favor of a new catalog of ideas. What would happen if, instead of planting individual trees, we approximated a forest? What if success hinged not on human tending but on trees tending, urging, and animating each other?

Four short years later, nestled among the familiar marks of landscape restoration and farm activities at the Horn Farm, this planting has transformed an exposed highway-side border into just what our stewards envisioned: a wall of forest, teeming with beauty and biodiversity that surpasses its simple protective function. Wilson was betting on a method he had stumbled upon while studying approaches to wildland renewal on degraded landscapes–a method employed worldwide but only just gaining traction in the United States–and it worked superbly. This was the Miyawaki Method for forest building. Since helping us keep a highway at bay, it has become a staple of expanding land stewardship actions at the Horn Farm Center.

The Miyawaki Method: Origins, Urgency, & Promise

Dr. Akira Miyawaki, the Japanese botanist and ecologist who originated the Miyawaki method, arrived at his revolutionary approach to building forests from a similar tension: seeing a human-made problem, and envisioning how trees might provide the solution.

The Japan of Miyawaki’s pre-World War II childhood was changing drastically. Rapid economic growth in the wake of the war resulted in levels of pollution and deforestation unseen in the country’s history. Amid this march of environmental degradation,1 he took notice of how native forests were well equipped–often better than human infrastructure–for withstanding the natural disasters afflicting Japan during this time period. In particular, he noticed how natural forest resilience averted further human tragedy time and time again, giving an emotional edge to a scientific question.

Stirred by this conviction that age-old forests provided both direct and indirect security to the human communities around them, and pairing this with the world-scale disfigurement of forests amid rampant industrialization, he devised a method that, in many ways, was already millions of years into its own devising.

To recoup forest health in a scalable way, Miyawaki took inspiration from the forests themselves.

What we call the Miyawaki Method is really a modified short-cut of the forest’s method for becoming a forest: recreating the conditions for the most mature community of plants in a natural forest to develop, but doing so at a rate that matches the pace of their collapse—fast.

Arriving at this method was far from fast. A key influence in Miyawaki’s method came with spending ample time among the sacred forests of Shinto shrines. Shinto is an Indigenous Japanese religion that, like many Indigenous animist spiritualities, recognizes the divine in the natural world. From this reverence, worshippers have taken care to cultivate and protect biodiversity around religious sites, creating sacred pocket forests called Chinju no mori. The richness of these centuries-old forests is based on the tending of vegetation most suited to the conditions of a particular place. While biologically sound, this is at its core a spiritual approach: Shinto holds that nature’s health is based not simply in the presence of life, but in the presence of the members of a natural community resident to a specific place. Over time, this management ethic generated pristinely layered and heterogenous forests, where small space made no small work of diversity. The key, Miyawaki observed, was verticality; he saw these forests as “time capsules, showing how indigenous forest was layered together from four categories of native plantings: main tree species, subspecies, shrubs, and ground-covering herbs.” Overall, the treasured forests of Shinto care infused their wisdom into Miyawaki’s approach, from the selection of species to the emphasis on vertical space to the conviction that small areas could still serve as repositories for diversity and resilience.

A Shinto temple and its companion forest (Honshu Island, Japan).

Over time, Miyawaki honed his approach to build a capital M “Method” that incorporated that additional consideration absent from the Shinto guidebook: urgency. In the Miyawaki Method, forests move from a counterpart to spiritual practice to a counterbalance against environmental damage. Working with government ministries, cities, schools, and industrial companies, he oversaw the planting of hundreds of “environmental protection forests” on exposed tracts that were otherwise considered negligible. You could say that the Shinto conception of a human space wrapped in a forest’s embrace was infusing its way into secular modern life.

Miyawaki’s work in Japan quickly leaped into mainland Asia, and he became a spokesperson for his method globally. Insisting on forested landscapes as countermeasures to all scales of human overreach–from pollution to climate change–his method casts attention to the narrow, the little, the forest-less, and the seemingly infertile. How could these degraded spaces be reawakened to a point where they resemble the functions of our shrinking and threatened existing forests?

“It was human activity that turned much of the world’s land into an unproductive semi-desert, and it must be human efforts that restore at least some of this area.”

– Akira Miyawaki

Miyawaki in North America: From the Ground Up

It should be clear now that the adjectives associated with Miyawaki’s approach to landscape restoration encapsulate an urgency for the work: rapid, dense, diverse, and resilient. Words like these took the method global, but it’s only just beginning to take root–literally–in eastern North America. The Horn Farm Center has planted away at the cutting edge of that rooting, taking up the method to address both immediate concerns and a legacy of deforestation that has scarred the Mid-Atlantic region. For context, a brief hike is in order: to survey the recent history of forestlands in the eastern US.

It’s well understood that prior to European colonization, much of the east was covered in forests. These included forested lands independent of human influence and thoughtfully-stewarded forest-mosaic landscapes favoring the edible, medicinal, and infrastructural species that Indigenous peoples relied on. As settlers encroached and imposed their version of production, swaths of forest were cleared like never before, and the characteristic species and ecological relationships of the region–refined over thousands of years–began to unravel. A 2013 article comparing pre- and post-colonization forests in the northeast traces this drama concisely:

“For more than 10,000 years native people cleared modest areas along waterways and seasonal settlements and managed some upland areas through sporadic understory burning. Even so, the region was overwhelmingly forested and chiefly governed by non-anthropogenic disturbances and successional dynamics until around 1650, when two centuries of logging and agricultural clearing were initiated that removed more than half of the forest cover and cut over almost all of the rest. Outside of the far north and rugged mountainous regions, the northeast became a predominantly humanized agrarian landscape.”

By 1900, Pennsylvania in particular had lost more than 60% of its forests to agriculture, logging, and industries like iron production–the remnants of which remain scattered throughout our Lower Susquehanna region. Once dominated by forests so thick “it seems almost as if the sun had never shown on the ground since the creation” (1743)2, a landscape that was biologically and climatologically primed for bold, diverse forests was quickly supplanted by monocrops and moonscapes. It was, of course, the humidity, density, and complexity of dynamic forests and their shifting waterways (did somebody say beavers?) that built the arable soils so desired by settlers; but with the soil-building process undermined by intensive agriculture, soils depleted, erosion spread, and the seed bank of the past dwindled.

Example of a clearcut in Pennsylvania, taken before 1920.

As populations concentrated and the American “breadbasket” shifted to the Midwest, agricultural expansion plateaued and a process of natural reforestation in abandoned areas began. This, alongside state remediation efforts and updates in logging policy, did contribute to a “rebound” in forest quantity during the 20th century, but as we can see today, many challenges remain.

Namely, the land is missing most of the ingredients that built the dynamic, productive, mosaic ecosystems of the past.

The legacies of the last 300 years have compacted, eroded, and denuded soils; confined and contaminated waterways; extinguished or extirpated ecosystem engineers like beavers, wolves, and passenger pigeons; introduced novel species that are highly adaptable to unfamiliar conditions; and diminished our own sense of place in relationship with the landscape: tenders, gatherers, and fire-makers partaking generatively in ecological world-building. Human activities have even disoriented the carbon cycle, with climate change-causing greenhouse gas emissions exceeding the rate at which natural systems like forests can recoup carbon from the atmosphere.3 It’s enough to induce a feeling of grim paralysis, but returning to the point: while we’ve certainly made strides in addressing ecological impairments through our households, industries, and communities, the full recovery of wild spaces stands against these odds. Any regenerating forest in the northeast is growing on a radically altered foundation, absent many of its ancient counterparts, strained by ongoing development, and under a rapidly changing climate.

All told, the Miyawaki method surfaces as a compelling addition to the toolbox for recovering dynamic, productive, and resilient northeastern forests. Designed for (modern) human-impacted landscapes and driven by the urgency of stacked environmental crises, it’s especially equipped for the situation we find ourselves. The services that forests provided are needed now more than ever, from protecting water quality to providing cooler microclimates, to diversifying food and material sources, and calling carbon back to the land to make climate change manageable. A way forward that expedites the revival of these services is evident, we believe, in Miyawaki’s east-coast debut at the Horn Farm.

Wilson standing in the Horn Farm Center’s first Miyawaki planting, December 2020.

Planting a Miyawaki: In Praise of Chaotic Biomimicry

Since Wilson’s initial experiment on the highway’s edge, the Horn Farm Center has undertaken the planting of over a dozen Miyawaki plots across our restoration landscape. This is the highest concentration of Miyawaki-inspired plantings in the east, with the 2018-2019 installations being the first of their kind on this side of the continent. The work of pioneering the Miyawaki method for eastern temperate forests has brought, collectively, 38 native species to our recovering landscape, as well as countless birds, insects, beneficial soil bacteria, fungi, and other beings that would not have found refuge when the land was conventionally farmed.

As mentioned earlier, the Miyawaki method is less about growing individual trees and more about approximating a mature, biodiverse forest in a short period of time. It’s an extension of a broader restoration concept called “biomimicry,” or imitating the structures, strategies, and relationships found in nature to aid in its recovery and solve human design challenges. So how does Miyawaki biomimic? And how does it move impaired land to a dynamic forest state so rapidly?

As winter transitions to spring and the prime time for tree planting approaches, the Horn Farm Center hosts classes led by Wilson that dig deep into the process for establishing a Miyawaki forest. A written summary cannot do any class justice, but some of the essentials are covered below, and “digging deep” is the step one:

Deep Soil Preparation

Just as a house requires a sturdy foundation, a forest requires stable soil. In a natural system, soil is built over time by decomposing layers of vegetation and organic materials. With each stage of ecological succession–or the movement of natural landscapes from initial “pioneer” species to forest species–the soil conditions are improved. Most agricultural and developed landscapes degrade soils by keeping natural elements “locked” in an idle or liminal state, thereby excluding the processes by which materials and nutrients cycle through the land and build living soils. These landscapes are also mowed, plowed, sanitized, and bereft of deep-rooting vegetation, exposing vulnerable topsoil to erosion while compacting the ground to the detriment of potential vegetation.

Landscapes like this are not prepared for forests, which grow out of the improved soils of previous successional stages. Therefore, in planting a Miyawaki mini-forest, we need to manually improve soil conditions to make the plot conducive to the mid- and late-successional forest species we are going to introduce. Practices for priming soil include decompaction by “double-digging” and aerating, the addition of organic matter like leaf mulch and compost, and inoculation with fungal mycelium typical of forest soils. It’s worth noting that Miyawaki stewards avoid undoing these improvements by not stepping on prepared soil areas–an experience strangely reminiscent of the “floor is lava” game. Together, these practices enable air flow, improve water retention, nurture the soil biotic community, and grant the return of regular nutrient cycling that sustains soil over time without artificial inputs.

Volunteers piling compost for amending soils in soon-to-be Miyawaki plots (winter 2020).
Volunteers double-digging and leaf-layering to prime soon-to-be Miyawaki plots (winter 2020).

Potential Natural Vegetation

“Potential Natural Vegetation” (PNV) describes “the hypothetical ecological potential of a piece of land” or “theoretical endpoint of succession.” In practice, it constitutes the overstory, understory, shrub, and herbaceous species that would characterize a mature natural space unaffected by human impacts. PNV is usually the outcome of natural succession, whereby hardy (“weedy”) pioneer species create the conditions conducive for perennial grass and shrublands, which create the conditions conducive for early forests, which transform overtime to mature layered forests. The Miyawaki method bypasses this time-intensive process for a similar result, favoring the community of species most appropriate for the environment when it reaches its “climax” state.

This high-diversity assortment collectively improves more soil, retains more water, and inhales more carbon than the modest plot size might suggest, thanks to variations at both the terrestrial and subterranean levels: staggered heights, root depths, shading/sunlight preferences, growth habits, and ecological roles. The inherent diversity of PNV also boosts resilience against disease and disturbance, with plants better equipped to exchange resources, and no single genetic vulnerability dominating the space. For the Horn Farm’s eastern temperate plantings, PNVs include overstory trees like oaks, hickories, and sycamores, understory trees like eastern redbud and dogwood, and shrubs like buttonbush, elderberry, and viburnums.

Graphic comparing natural forest succession with the Miyawaki method, created by Education & Communications Intern Mel Beans.

High Density, High Randomization

“In natural forests, fertilization is done by the wind or by wandering pollinators […] It is a total random disorder. This Chaos model is an optimized system. This tactic is the best protection from windstorms, powerful floods or even heavy snowfall.”

Indeed, the Miyawaki method embraces the game of chance that governs forest dynamics. This means relinquishing the human impulse to control or design. Once determined, species are interspersed arbitrarily, and at a seemingly precarious density: 18 to 24” apart. 4000 sq feet, in this case, can accommodate 1500 trees: the outcome of the Horn Farm Center’s 2020 volunteer plantings. Density like this bucks the cultural notion of cutthroat competition defining ecological relationships, which is a dangerous misreading of Darwin to say the least. High density planting actually stimulates the dance of mutual and competitive interactions found in forests: urging plants upward while fostering cooperative exchanges below ground, aided by the mycelium added during soil preparation. It also maximizes the presence of roots with which beneficial soil microorganisms develop their own symbiotic relationships. What appears to be a paradox–a coexistence of cooperation and competition–yields upwards of 90% survival in Miyawaki plantings.

Now, there are a few recommendations to placate a desire for order, and these help to ensure randomization doesn’t inadvertently compromise diversity. For one, the species categories represented in a given Miyawaki plot–those being canopy trees, understory trees, and shrubs–can be mathematically parsed out into different proportions depending on planting goals that might accompany landscape renewal, like creating bird habitat, a food forest, riparian cover, etc. Plantings can also be divided between “major” and “minor” species representations, with 5-7 species chosen for 50% of the whole and a large amount of alternative species set aside for the other 50%.

Volunteers closely spacing seedlings in a prepared soil bed (spring 2021)
Volunteers planting randomized seedlings in a prepared soil bed (spring 2021)

STUN: Sheer, Total, Utter Neglect

Over the history of the Earth, most forests became forests without human intervention. Being forest-adjacent, a Miyawaki plot is no different. That brings up another human impulse to stem during the process of mothering a Miyawaki: the desire to tend to its growth with watering, weeding, fertilization, etc. Weeding in the first year in areas prone to encroachment from prolific species is one exception, but otherwise, barring unexpected circumstances, the longevity of a plot is best achieved when it’s left to fend for itself. Trees watered too routinely become dependent on a consistent watering cycle, which isn’t reflective of the natural world, especially one undergoing climate change. After potential weeding in the first and second years, a third-year Miyawaki plot is usually self-sufficient and self-sustaining: filled out by trees helping themselves and nudging each other through a marriage of cooperation and competition. Part of the joy in the Miyawaki method is casual visitation, to watch maturity unfold in a digestible time frame–ten times faster than conventional restoration tree plantings.

Woodland Steward Wilson and Farm Manager Andrew surveying the Horn Farm’s first Miyawaki plot in the summer of 2020.

Rewilding & Reintegration: Spreading the Miyawaki Seed

The smallness of a Miyawaki planting is its greatest strength. While the scale of ecological wrongs to be righted is unutterably daunting, stepping foot on a path straddled by two Miyawaki mini-forests–surpassing ten feet in just two growing seasons–is enough to temper the despair and recognize that seeds, small as they may be, are solutions. If allowed, Miyawaki plots will cast themselves outward from their nuclear origins. The seeds and pollen they produce as they mature will grow forth from those confines where humans gave them life, moved by birds, insects, wind and rain, and ourselves. New sprouts will volunteer in the nearby landscape, just as new ideas will take root in backyards, schoolyards, farmyards, and those other once-forested lands left barren by a myopic vision of progress. Planting a Miyawaki forest gives nature its missing pieces while piecing together our own sense of place on the land, as we re-learn what it needs to grow, thrive, and give immeasurably on and on:

“Mini-forests are where we touch life. We explore our place, discover what is native, restore our soil, nurture a small ecosystem that restores life. Watching a mini-forest grow several feet a year, watching it become more complex and beautiful in front our eyes, knowing that it has a direct impact on the biosphere and atmosphere—these relationships feed us. They feed our longing to make a difference, our need to connect to what is regenerative and act. Facts do not change our minds. Actions change our minds. As we get involved with the acts of regeneration […] our sense of self and what is possible transforms. A mini-forest of ideas and hope is born within us as well.”

– Paul Hawken, “Forward” in Mini-Forest Revolution: Using the Miyawaki Method to Rapidly Rewild the World (2022)

1) Deforestation worldwide is an ongoing crisis. Between 1990 and 2015 the world lost 129 million hectares of [forests], which equals “two Texases.” Deforestation is responsible for an estimated 5 billion tons, or 17 percent, of annual global carbon emissions, not to mention soil erosion and biodiversity loss.

2) Journaled by John Bartram while traveling up the Susquehanna River in 1743

3) With an estimated loss of 270 kilohectares (khas), or 667,184 acres, of forest cover between 2001 and 2022, Pennsylvania emitted the equivalent of 94.6 megatons (Mt) of the greenhouse gas CO2 from deforestation alone. 1Mt is roughly equivalent to a space filling a cube 27 feet tall, wide, and long (imagine a cube made of telephone poles), so that much carbon fills a three-dimensional space of about 2,554 feet–about half a mile tall, wide, and long. The importance of these regional numbers is underwritten by their concurrence nationally and internationally.


About the Authors:

Andrew Leahy

Growing up in the foothills of Ricketts Glen State Park, Andrew spent his early life in the embrace of Northeastern PA forests, sowing the seeds for his ongoing enchantment with the natural world and its stewardship. While studying English and Music Composition at Muhlenberg College, he gravitated toward nonprofit engagement as a work study student in the college’s Office of Community Engagement. Now, at the Horn Farm Center, Andrew manages social media, develops educational programs, coordinates volunteer events, and collaborates on marketing projects, large events, and organizational capacity-building. Through all of this, he is a dedicated student of the land, with a life’s mission of learning (and providing spaces for others to learn) about bioregional ecology, regenerative agriculture, permaculture, foraging, and locally-focused ways of living in reciprocal relationship with nature.

Mel Beans

Mel is a rising junior at Franklin & Marshall College pursuing a B.A. in environmental studies and public policy. After taking an environmental justice course and diving into research on “forever chemicals,” she realized that she wanted to pursue a career that actively acknowledges and addresses the ways in which the environment is deeply interconnected with and integral to our wellbeing. She jumped on the opportunity to intern at Horn Farm Center, seeing how our mission aligns with her passions and career goals. As the Education & Communications Intern, she’s grateful to contribute to HFC’s essential role in demonstrating not only sustainable, but regenerative and resilient agriculture by assisting with research and outreach. In her free time, she enjoys being with friends and family and in nature, thrifting, listening to music, and watching video essays. On campus, she is a house advisor and the president of Catastrophic Relief Alliance, an F&M organization that addresses housing needs locally and nationally, especially in the wake of natural disasters.